Qur'anic Signs documents 64 signs and 28 prophecies or predictions drawn from the Qur'an and the Hadith literature, dating from the lifetime of the Prophet Muhammad (peace be upon him), roughly fourteen centuries ago.
Editorial stance
The site is informative rather than persuasive. It does not preach, it does not sensationalize, and it does not overclaim. Where an argument is strong it is presented as strong; where it depends on interpretation, or rests on a disputed narration or contested science, the entry says so in plain terms. The goal is that a Muslim reader, a reader of another faith, and a reader of no faith should each find the presentation fair.
How entries are built
Every entry follows the same structure: the source text quoted exactly (Arabic with the Saheeh International English translation, and the precise surah:ayah or collection-and-number citation); the historical context of what seventh-century audiences knew or believed; the modern scientific finding or later historical event claimed to correspond to it, with dated, mainstream references; and a “Considerations” section carrying the strongest counterargument or skeptical reading. Citations were verified against the databases at quran.com and sunnah.com.
The credibility tiers
Ratings are editorial judgments made for this site, on this rule:
Tier 1 · Strong — authentic source, clear text, well-documented correspondence. (8 entries)
Tier 2 · Interpretive — reasonable, but depends on how the text is read. (46 entries)
Tier 3 · Contested — weak or disputed: da'if narration, strained translation, or disputed science. (38 entries)
Tiering errs downward: when editors were unsure, the lower tier was assigned. Inclusion at Tier 3 is documentation, not endorsement.
Texts and translations used
Qur'an: Arabic text in the Uthmani script and the Saheeh International translation, as published at quran.com. Hadith: the collections and numbering used at sunnah.com, with gradings as reported there from recognized graders (al-Albani, Darussalam, and the classical judgments of al-Bukhari and Muslim). Scientific and historical claims cite mainstream secular sources — encyclopedias, agencies, peer-reviewed literature, and standard histories — listed at the foot of each entry.
Corrections
A reference like this lives on its accuracy. If you find a citation error, a misquotation, a misstated grading, or a scientific claim outrunning its source — or if you would like to suggest a new entry or ask for more depth on an existing one — please use the feedback form. Submissions go directly to the editor.